What Dividend Investors Should Know About Technology Stocks

There’s a Massive Global Need for Increased Infrastructure Spending

In the United States, infrastructure is aging and under strain—which is why an infrastructure bill is in play. The need is significant. Just this year, the American Society of Civil Engineers graded a range of infrastructure categories and determined many were approaching failure, requiring nearly $6 trillion to maintain a good state of repair. Traditional funding sources like municipalities are unable to meet future requirements given their fiscal challenges, so not only federal, but also private investment may be required.

The same holds true globally. In its 2019 Global Risks Report, the World Economic Forum noted that to keep pace with global population and economic growth, and to meet the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals of clean water and electricity, $97 trillion needed to be invested into global infrastructure. Based on current spending trends, there is a $18 trillion spending shortfall—a shortfall that may attract capital long after a stimulus bill and economic reopening.

Infrastructure Has Offered Compelling Yields Backed by Stable Cash Flows

Not all infrastructure companies are the same. As a group, companies that build or develop infrastructure—construction companies, raw material producers, airline manufacturers and the like—tend to be more volatile and prone to boom and bust cycles. When times are good, their revenues and earnings may increase, only to falter when the economic cycle cools.

However, pure-play infrastructure—companies that own and operate infrastructure assets, such as airports, cell towers and the like—are different. These assets are essential, large-scale, often with limited competition, and, despite the aberrant events of the pandemic, consumer demand for their services tends to be inelastic, making their business models less cyclical in nature.

These critical differences have resulted in contrasting risk and return profiles over time. While pure-play infrastructure, as represented by the DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, has delivered slightly higher risk-adjusted returns over cyclical infrastructure, as represented by the Indxx U.S. Development Infrastructure index, the “ride” experienced by investors has been very different. This could prove beneficial following the strong market rally of 2020 and the uncertainty ahead.

Two successive U.S. administrations, one from each party, have now stressed the importance of an infrastructure bill. With a unified government, the prospects for federal infrastructure investment are rising. President Biden has laid out a $2 trillion plan to rebuild America’s infrastructure that includes fixing 20,000 miles of roads and over 10,000 bridges, and Speaker Pelosi has committed to moving swiftly on legislation. These latest efforts may not be the only catalyst for infrastructure companies to potentially benefit from increased attention and spending. As the economy reopens post-pandemic, it is reasonable to expect more road and air travel as people attempt to shake off quarantine cobwebs. Also, the promise of enhanced wireless communication and 5G are transforming the world’s communication capabilities.

Pure-play infrastructure—the companies that own and operate infrastructure assets such as airports and toll roads—have attractive characteristics for many investors and, as we consider the backdrop of government stimulus and economic reopening, may be a compelling way to access the infrastructure opportunity. While construction companies may be the primary beneficiaries of a building boom, the companies that own, maintain and collect fees from the ongoing use of infrastructure are positioned to benefit over the long haul.

There’s a Massive Global Need for Increased Infrastructure Spending

In the United States, infrastructure is aging and under strain—which is why an infrastructure bill is in play. The need is significant. Just this year, the American Society of Civil Engineers graded a range of infrastructure categories and determined many were approaching failure, requiring nearly $6 trillion to maintain a good state of repair. Traditional funding sources like municipalities are unable to meet future requirements given their fiscal challenges, so not only federal, but also private investment may be required.

The same holds true globally. In its 2019 Global Risks Report, the World Economic Forum noted that to keep pace with global population and economic growth, and to meet the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals of clean water and electricity, $97 trillion needed to be invested into global infrastructure. Based on current spending trends, there is a $18 trillion spending shortfall—a shortfall that may attract capital long after a stimulus bill and economic reopening.

Infrastructure Has Offered Compelling Yields Backed by Stable Cash Flows

Not all infrastructure companies are the same. As a group, companies that build or develop infrastructure—construction companies, raw material producers, airline manufacturers and the like—tend to be more volatile and prone to boom and bust cycles. When times are good, their revenues and earnings may increase, only to falter when the economic cycle cools.

However, pure-play infrastructure—companies that own and operate infrastructure assets, such as airports, cell towers and the like—are different. These assets are essential, large-scale, often with limited competition, and, despite the aberrant events of the pandemic, consumer demand for their services tends to be inelastic, making their business models less cyclical in nature.

These critical differences have resulted in contrasting risk and return profiles over time. While pure-play infrastructure, as represented by the DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, has delivered slightly higher risk-adjusted returns over cyclical infrastructure, as represented by the Indxx U.S. Development Infrastructure index, the “ride” experienced by investors has been very different. This could prove beneficial following the strong market rally of 2020 and the uncertainty ahead.

Two successive U.S. administrations, one from each party, have now stressed the importance of an infrastructure bill. With a unified government, the prospects for federal infrastructure investment are rising. President Biden has laid out a $2 trillion plan to rebuild America’s infrastructure that includes fixing 20,000 miles of roads and over 10,000 bridges, and Speaker Pelosi has committed to moving swiftly on legislation. These latest efforts may not be the only catalyst for infrastructure companies to potentially benefit from increased attention and spending. As the economy reopens post-pandemic, it is reasonable to expect more road and air travel as people attempt to shake off quarantine cobwebs. Also, the promise of enhanced wireless communication and 5G are transforming the world’s communication capabilities.

Pure-play infrastructure—the companies that own and operate infrastructure assets such as airports and toll roads—have attractive characteristics for many investors and, as we consider the backdrop of government stimulus and economic reopening, may be a compelling way to access the infrastructure opportunity. While construction companies may be the primary beneficiaries of a building boom, the companies that own, maintain and collect fees from the ongoing use of infrastructure are positioned to benefit over the long haul.

There’s a Massive Global Need for Increased Infrastructure Spending

In the United States, infrastructure is aging and under strain—which is why an infrastructure bill is in play. The need is significant. Just this year, the American Society of Civil Engineers graded a range of infrastructure categories and determined many were approaching failure, requiring nearly $6 trillion to maintain a good state of repair. Traditional funding sources like municipalities are unable to meet future requirements given their fiscal challenges, so not only federal, but also private investment may be required.

The same holds true globally. In its 2019 Global Risks Report, the World Economic Forum noted that to keep pace with global population and economic growth, and to meet the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals of clean water and electricity, $97 trillion needed to be invested into global infrastructure. Based on current spending trends, there is a $18 trillion spending shortfall—a shortfall that may attract capital long after a stimulus bill and economic reopening.

Infrastructure Has Offered Compelling Yields Backed by Stable Cash Flows

Not all infrastructure companies are the same. As a group, companies that build or develop infrastructure—construction companies, raw material producers, airline manufacturers and the like—tend to be more volatile and prone to boom and bust cycles. When times are good, their revenues and earnings may increase, only to falter when the economic cycle cools.

However, pure-play infrastructure—companies that own and operate infrastructure assets, such as airports, cell towers and the like—are different. These assets are essential, large-scale, often with limited competition, and, despite the aberrant events of the pandemic, consumer demand for their services tends to be inelastic, making their business models less cyclical in nature.

These critical differences have resulted in contrasting risk and return profiles over time. While pure-play infrastructure, as represented by the DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, has delivered slightly higher risk-adjusted returns over cyclical infrastructure, as represented by the Indxx U.S. Development Infrastructure index, the “ride” experienced by investors has been very different. This could prove beneficial following the strong market rally of 2020 and the uncertainty ahead.